|
Our
lucky streak of quality independent features is on the line with
this week's film, Dry Eye Picture's Make a
Killing: The husband and wife team of Chris and Vanessa
Magyar's mini-opus about the behind the scenes operations of an
assisted killing organization (and I'll explain that concept during
the review.)
Now the first thing
your going to see when you pop the DVD in is "Stomp Tokyo
Presents" and you'll think -- isn't this clown a part of the Stomp
Tokyo empire? Doesn't that make him a little biased? Well, if biased
means I hope it doesn't suck then, yeah, I'm biased.
Look, I've only met
Chris twice, in passing, at B-Fest, and the first conversation
basically consisted of him asking me what I thought of Heironymous
Merkin -- to which I replied it monumentally sucked; and the second
conversation consisted of me asking him if he had any jumper cables
because some idiot, me, left the dome light on his car resulting in
a dead battery. So I think that qualifies me as impartial. Don't
you?
Let's get to it.
-
- - -
We
open in the thick of it. Three women are running from something, he
said ominously, and take refuge in a barn. Their safety is short
lived as a masked misanthrope breaks into the barn, knocks two of
the girls unconscious with a brick and chases the other (producer
Vanessa Magyar subbing in
for a missing actress) deeper into the barn. After several
twists and turns she's cornered and killed, stabbed in the guts.
Another
man suddenly appears and encourages the killer to try stabbing her
in the heart next time. Soon the scene is swarming with people
decked out in blue jumpsuits. What the hell goes on here?
The
first man orders the others to get to work staging the final scene.
They scramble, quickly, to get it done before the girl wakes up. (What
about the other girl? The one the killer missed with the brick by a
noticeable mile? She was a ringer.) The killer takes his mask
off and complains that he's hungry. Not to worry, there's a caterer.
The
final girl (Marilyn Taylor) is placed
in a circle of candles, complete with a (fake) bloody
pentagram. She starts to come around so the jumpsuits scramble into
hidden positions. The girl wakes up, starts her tour of the barn,
finds the bodies of her friends and eventually runs into the killer.
She bolts out the door. The killer is about to give chase but is
stopped by his group of helpers and given a lawnmower. He cranks it
up and happily gives chase. All the crew gathers and watches him go,
nodding in approval of a job well done.
Again.
What the hell goes on here?
Welcome
to the world of Assisted Killing Amalgamated a/k/a AKA.
What
is Assisted Killing Amalgamated? I'll
let them explain it for you and wait right here until you come
back...
You
didn't think all those psychotic killers pulled off all those
intricate schemes by themselves did you? Of course not. They're practically
impossible and improbable, and that's without even getting actual
physics involved, to accomplish alone. That's where these guys come
in:
-
John Simpson (Brian
Colonna): is the CEO of AKA and rounds up the clients.
-
Sylvia Chase (Hanna
Duggan): is in charge of operations. An ex-Marine she's
in charge of the physical training and arming of the clients
with just the right lethally sharp object.
-
Fran Gunderson (Jeni
Reiner): takes care of make-up, costuming and props.
-
Joshua George (Gregory
Brown): also in the prop department but specializes in
scene aesthetics.
-
Steven
Grabowalski (Evan Weissman): is in
charge of transportation and logistics. He also gladly fills the
role of virgin deflowerer so their clients need have no fear of
the final girl.
-
Bobby Bartleby (Ryan
Trost): The latest in a long line of interns. (Think
of the drummer in Spinal Tap.)
-
Lisa Slade (Lodore
Brown): The aforementioned ringer. An infiltration
specialist who leads the victims into danger instead of out of
it.
Sounds
like a dangerous band of cutthroats, right?
Wrong.
They're
all a bunch of bungling boobs or self-absorbed cretins. We haven't
seen this much evil match this kind of ineptitude since the days of
Dr. Clayton Forrester and TV's Frank in Deep 13. The film
picks up as the camera documents the making of promotional video for
AKA as they want to show how their operations work from beginning to
the end.
We're
introduced to their new client, Randall (Erik
Edborg), who's a couple a cans short of a full six-pack. They
have to keep Randall under control with a taser (and I just
don't have the heart to tell them that when you're zapping someone
with one of those, you really shouldn't grab them while doing it.
The body being a conductor and all that. Ah, well.)
We
get into the nuts and bolts of the daily operations of AKA as
Randall is put through the paces, all the while stopping for
one-on-ones with the crew as they explain their jobs and why they
work for AKA.
The
camera doesn't flinch when things go awry and we don't either.
D-Day
approaches and all the details of Randall's murder spree are worked
out. (And, yes, I see this all ending in fire.) And
since this is a slasher movie, expect the unexpected and a twist
ending that comes straight out of nowhere and doesn't make a whole
lot of sense which, in this case, makes it a perfect ending.
The
End?
Murder may be a
serious business but comedy, I believe, is infinitely harder to pull
off. Mix those two things together and you've usually got a
recipe for an unmitigated disaster. Add in the factors of first time
filmmakers; a budget of about $36 dollars; a cast and crew paid in
pizza and beer to this volatile mix -- and we're talking about the
possibility of an unmitigated disasters of biblical proportions.
I'm
happy to report that Make A Killing
defies those odds. Rather deftly I might add. A miracle? Not really
from what we see on film. It is by no means perfect but it's not
that far off. They're at least in the same zip code. Honest.
It's
my understanding that the origins of the picture can actually be
traced back to B-Fest and a conversation during a lull about the age
old argument of how do those masked killers in all those slasher
movies pull off all those impossible schemes. Simple enough. They
had help.
That
idea was picked up, kicked around, pummeled, hammered out and
committed to film somewhere in Colorado. It's easy to make fun of
these kinds of films but very few of us actually try to make one
ourselves. I tried, back in high school. It was such a complete
logistical disaster that we never even shot one frame of video.
That's why I'm pretty forgiving for the lack of budgets and polish
in these things. As Ray Dennis Steckler once said "I spent $20
dollars on the movie and I can guarantee you'll see all $20 dollars
on screen."
Most
of the film's success can be attributed to the cast. The premise is
thin but milked for all its worth. There's genuine comedy to be
found here, not the poking it with a sharp stick kind of comedy
because it sucks.
Judging
by the performances I'm guessing most of these folks aren't amateurs.
Nothing can sink one of these things faster than a bad cast but,
again, not the case here. (And the commentary track confirms
our suspicions that most of the funnier lines were adlibbed. And I
might also add that the commentary track by the battling Magyars was
pretty funny as they argue over the difference between self-deprecating
humor and self-defecation humor. Again with the poop jokes!)
Technically
the film looks great. (I only saw one boom mike.) The
hand held camera work, documentary style staging and person to
person chat sessions invoke a Reno 911/Spinal
Tap style of filmmaking. And if that is what they were going
for, they pulled it off. There aren't any real gory kill shots. Why?
They didn't know how -- and made the wise decision not to fake it.
What little there is pulled off with the slight of hand, the old
bait-n-switch and the directors best friend - the jump cut.
I
honestly think the best compliment I can give this film is that I
laughed when I was supposed to and not when I wasn't supposed to. I
hope sometime in the future, if the financial means ever present
itself, that the filmmakers would revisit this production, fine-tune
the script just a little bit, round up the cast and expand it to
feature length. I want to see more disasters with earlier clients. I
want to see more interns accidentally killed. I want to see more in
house bickering. I want to see how many more poop jokes we can cram
in here.
The
talent is definitely there.
So
maybe from this acorn there will spring a mighty oak?
We've
already got a pretty solid sapling.
|